|
Reinstallation
of
King
Moshoeshoe
II
Mosisili
Appointed
Deputy
Prime
Minister
Rebellion
In
National
Security
Service
Lawyer
Claims
Reinstatement
of
the
King
Unconstitutional
National
Security
Service
‘Ninjas’
Act
with
Impunity
Report
of
Commission
of
Inquiry
into
Army
Disturbances
The
Reinstallation
of
King
Moshoeshoe
II
took
place
in
Maseru
on
25
January
1995
before
invited
guests,
but,
it
was
said
by
many,
without
much
public
enthusiasm,
the
monarchy
having
tarnished
its
image
in
recent
events,
and
being
no
longer
perceived
as
serving
any
useful
purpose.
The
uncertainty
of
who
was
King
over
the
previous
five
years
had
led
to
the
King’s
portrait
being
omitted
both
from
postage
stamps
and
from
bank
notes.
Bank
notes
played
safe
by
replacing
the
portrait
of
King
Moshoeshoe
II
by
that
of
his
namesake,
the
nineteenth
century
founder
of
the
Lesotho
Kingdom,
King
Moshoeshoe
I.
▲back
to top
Late
in
January,
a
Deputy
Prime
Minister
to
replace
Selometsi
Baholo
was
finally
appointed.
He
was
the
Minister
of
Education,
Professor
Pakalitha
Mosisili,
who
retained
the
Education
portfolio.
Of
more
signifance
to
some
people
was
a
Cabinet
reshuffle
a
month
later
in
which
the
Foreign
Minister,
Molapo
Qhobela,
was
transferred
to
the
Ministry
of
Public
Works.
The
new
Minister
of
Foreign
Affairs
was
the
former
Minister
of
Information,
Mpho
Malie.
Informed
sources
within
Parliament
said
that
Molapo
Qhobela
had
been
against
foreign
intervention
to
solve
the
intractable
problems
with
the
security
forces,
and
Mpho
Malie
would
favour
a
more
realistic
stance
in
the
face
of
the
present
stalemate.
Another
appointment
made
at
about
the
same
time
as
the
Cabinet
reshuffle
was
that
of
Tom
Motsoahae
Thabane
who
became
Adviser
to
the
Prime
Minister.
This
occasioned
some
surprise
because
of
Tom
Thabane’s
association
with
previous
undemocratic
regimes.
He
had
been
Principal
Secretary
for
Health
in
the
Government
of
Leabua
Jonathan,
and
later
at
different
times
Secretary
to
the
Military
Council
and
Minister
of
Foreign
Affairs
and
Information
during
the
1986-93
Military
Regime.
▲back
to top
The
Government’s
problems
with
the
army
and
police
by
now
were
indeed
well
known,
and
had
rendered
it
powerless
to
take
firm
action
in
many
areas.
As
if
this
were
not
enough,
problems
now
emerged
with
the
National
Security
Service
(NSS),
which
was
the
successor
to
what
had
once
been
the
Police
Special
Branch,
and
in
the
days
of
Leabua’s
Government
had
had
the
special
role
of
spying
on
the
BCP.
Like
army
and
police,
its
staff
tended
to
be
hard
core
supporters
of
the
BNP,
whose
role
under
a
BCP
government
was
likely
to
be
full
of
contradictions.
Unlike
the
army,
the
cause
of
whose
disturbances
in
1994
were
undocumented
by
statements
from
either
of
the
feuding
factions,
rebellious
junior
members
‘Detectives
of
the
National
Security
Service’,
issued
their
version
of
events
in
the
NSS
in
full
(text
to
be
found
in
The
Mirror
of
5
April
1995).
The
junior
ranks
claimed
that
they
had
undertaken
covert
investigations
which
implicated
‘in
a
serious
manner
three
of
our
very
senior
officers
in
acts
that
culminated
into
harmful
compromise
of
the
National
Security
Intelligence
establishment’.
They
apparently
on
their
own
initiative
decided
to
dismiss
Colonel
Mohau
Thaha,
Lieutenant-Colonel
Molikuoa
Tumane
and
Major
Tona
Putsoane
from
the
NSS,
action
reminiscent
of
the
dismissal
of
four
senior
army
officers
by
junior
ranks
in
November
1993,
and
indeed
action
which
was
a
prelude
to
later
army
disturbances.
When
the
Director
of
the
National
Security
Service,
Major-General
Leaooa
Seoane,
refused
to
allow
the
dismissals,
the
‘Detectives’
stated
that
they
had
in
turn
investigated
him,
and
found
him
to
be
‘at
the
helm
of
a
clique’
diverting
NSS
activities
to
furthering
certain
political
concerns.
It
appears
that
Major-General
Seoane
then
became
determined
to
dismiss
the
rebellious
‘Detectives’,
and
they
claimed
to
have
intercepted
a
letter
he
had
written
to
the
Attorney-General,
seeking
advice
on
this
matter.
At
this
point
the
rebellious
NSS
staff
decided
to
take
pre-emptive
action,
and
on
20
February
1995
barred
him
from
occupying
NSS
offices.
Seoane
then
went
and
occupied
an
office
in
the
Ministry
of
Defence
and
on
3
March,
twelve
of
the
detectives
were
served
with
letters
giving
them
four
days
in
which
to
show
why
action
should
not
be
taken
against
them
for
acts
of
insubordination
and
indiscipline.
On
Monday
6
March,
members
of
the
NSS
took
Major-General
Seoane
hostage,
and
after
questioning
him,
also
‘arrested’
Colonel
Thaha.
Attempts
to
secure
their
release
were
made
by
political
party
leaders,
church
leaders,
and
non-governmental
organisations.
The
NSS
members
refused
to
meet
senior
representatives
of
the
Botswana,
South
African
and
Zimbabwean
governments
who
tried
to
intervene.
They
did
however
meet
with
the
Secretary-General
of
the
Commonwealth,
Chief
Emeka
Anyaoku.
Soon
after
this
meeting,
on
25
March,
Major-General
Seoane
and
Colonel
Thaha
were
released,
on
the
understanding
that
both
would
be
brought
before
Courts
of
Law
on
charges
which
the
detectives
said
they
had
investigated.
General
rumour
was
that
these
charges
were
quite
preposterous
(planned
assassination
of
the
King
etc)
and
so
unsubstantiated
that
the
Attorney-General
was
unlikely
to
proceed
further.
At
the
same
time
it
seemed
that
no
action
was
going
to
be
taken
against
the
rebellious
detectives,
so
that
the
NSS
joined
the
police
and
army
as
‘disciplined’
forces
in
name
only,
because
senior
officers
could
not
give
orders
which
would
automatically
be
obeyed
by
subordinate
ranks.
▲back
to top
There
were
other
developments
in
March.
It
became
known
that
a
Cape
Town
lawyer
had
submitted
a
legal
opinion
to
Fine
Maema,
the
Attorney-General,
that
Act
No.
10
of
1994
reinstating
the
King
was
likely,
if
challenged,
to
be
held
to
be
unconstitutional,
and
that
all
legislation
signed
by
King
Moshoeshoe
II
since
his
reinstatement
would
be
regarded
as
invalid.
A
Maseru
lawyer,
Thabang
Khauoe,
entered
the
limelight
when
he
did
indeed
bring
a
High
Court
action
to
have
Act
No.
10
of
1994
declared
null
and
void.
On
18
March,
Khauoe
had
a
meeting
in
Pretoria
with
President
Nelson
Mandela,
the
South
African
Director
of
Foreign
Affairs,
J.
J.
Basson,
and
the
First
Secretary
to
the
South
African
High
Commission
in
Lesotho,
R.
G.
Mahlo.
It
was
reported
that
President
Mandela
urged
Khauoe
to
drop
the
case.
▲back
to top
Shortly
after
his
return
to
Lesotho
on
20
March,
Khauoe
was
said
to
have
been
kidnapped
by
National
Security
Service
‘Ninjas’.
He
was
released
12
hours
later,
obviously
injured,
but
refused
to
talk
to
the
press
about
what
had
happened
to
him.
The
NSS
also
acted
on
29
March
against
Monyane
Moleleki,
the
former
Minister
of
National
Resources
who
a
week
earlier
had
returned
to
Lesotho
after
nearly
a
year
in
exile.
He
was
also
detained
by
‘Ninjas’
while
collecting
his
children
from
school,
accompanied
by
his
wife.
He
also
made
no
statement
to
the
press
after
his
release.
▲back
to top
Against
a
background
of
theoretically
disciplined
forces
taking
the
law
into
their
own
hands,
Government
must
have
been
wondering
what
concrete
steps
it
could
take
to
implement
the
Report
of
the
Commission
of
Inquiry
into
Army
Disturbances.
Although
not
formally
published
by
Government,
long
excerpts
were
published
in
the
newspaper
Mopheme
of
14
March
1995.
The
Report
recommended
the
restructuring
of
the
Defence
Force
and
its
employment
in
civil
works
for
which
technical
and
professional
personnel
should
be
recruited.
The
Constitution
should
be
amended
to
make
the
Defence
Commission
responsible
to
Parliament.
The
Report
contained
many
detailed
recommendations,
and
also
recommended
the
discharge
of
all
found
guilty
of
misconduct.
To
facilitate
reconciliation
and
avoid
further
mutiny,
‘those
guilty
should
be
discharged
with
full
terminal
benefits’.
Regarding
the
involvement
of
the
Defence
Force
in
disturbances,
the
report
suggests
where
further
enquiries
might
be
made.
In
regard
to
the
death
of
the
Deputy
Prime
Minister,
Mr.
Selometsi
Baholo
it
suggests
that
Members
of
‘E’
Company
could
assist
in
explaining
what
happened.
The
Report
also
made
recommendations
on
the
resettlement
and
where
appropriate
incorporation
into
the
army
of
former
members
of
the
Lesotho
Liberation
Army.
It
also
recommend
that
a
special
committee
of
experts
be
set
up
to
assess
claims
for
damage
to
property,
personal
injury
and
loss
of
life
arising
from
the
army
disturbances.
[updated
to
31
March
1995]
▲back
to top |